page describes a major symptom of Elite influence and control.
The operations (conspiracies) intended to advance the Elite
Agenda of fascist, global dominion (supranational world government
using business-dominated entities) comprise most of the world's
major geopolitical, social, and financial chaos.
you are new to the idea of the 'Power Elite' (aka 'Ruling Class,'
'Elite,' 'Illuminati,' 'Corporatocracy,' and so on), please see
the introductory summary/description
Elite Agenda and M-O.
is a more
extensive analysis [off-site
link, new window/tab], though not quite as involved
as it gets. Be aware that there are varying views on the nature
and scope of the Elite. For example, the preceding link says they've
been active for about a hundred years, whereas others say centuries,
even thousands of years. I lean toward the latter view.
is no more important political issue in America than 9/11 truth.
The Chemtrail operation is much bigger
in scope, but is not the same.
The 9/11 scam embodies every aspect of elite
MO to advance its Agenda.
David Ray Griffin's first book about 9/11 is called The New
Pearl Harbor. This is meant to convey the
idea that, like Pearl Harbor, 9/11 was the driving force behind
America's entry into a war--in this case the War on Terror (WoT).
The analogy doesn't end there, however.
truth about Pearl Harbor is that FDR knew it was coming and facilitated
it, as he was committed to getting the US into WW II. The definitive
book on this is Day of Deceit, by Robert B. Stinnett.
The analogy here, of course, is that there was foreknowledge of
9/11 within the Bush Administration, and that it was allowed to
happen for a number of political and geopolitical reasons, among
them to launch the WoT and to gain all the societal controls and
profit that goes with it. Again, however, the
analogy doesn't end there.
9/11 truth movement is seething with evidence strongly suggesting
that it goes well beyond complicity to detailed planning and direct
involvement in the operation by 'Americans' on the inside, the
main operative in some people's view being Dick Cheney.
are others who say Israel's spy agency Mossad were the primary
movers. After Mossad's participation in the BCCI scam, sending
laundered drug money to the Cointras, this isn't hard to swallow
in theory. But it's unlikely one group alone could have pulled
this off. One could say that 9/11 was an cooperative intelligence
success, not a failure, as disinfo artists contend. And, according
to others, major figures were involved that are non-Mossad--like
Rudy Giuliani and Elliot Spitzer.
easier to get one's head around this by understanding that corporatists
and elite operatives have no loyalty to any nation. They are no
more Americans and patriots than you are Casper the Ghost when
you put on you Halloween costume. Their only interest in America,
or any nation, is how it can be used to further their personal
interests and the globalist Agenda.
historical facts show that both events bear strong resemblance
to items in a long line of staged/allowed pretexts for war. These
include the Battleship Maine, Hitler's Reichstag fire, the Gulf
of Tonkin incident, and the baby-incubator scam prior to Gulf
War I. This is how the elite operate.
people would argue that the Kean 9/11 Commission answered all
the questions. Again, Griffin has provided a valuable source,
The 9/11 Commission Report; Omissions and Distortions,
that lays bare the serious inadequacies that can only be called
Coverup. There is also a spate of websites that have arisen which
deal in various ways with the shakiness of the official conspiracy
difficulty is that because 9/11 is the consummate elite operation
and so big, the perpetrators are using a major elite tactic--infiltrate
the opposition to control the direction it takes, or to discredit
it. "Even" Griffin, who has 'miraculously' been embraced
by divergent cliques and groups who rail at each other, has shown
certain weaknesses that raise questions
about his integrity. This makes it a challenge for people
who are unfamiliar to navigate what's being presented.
point is made in a VERY
UNUSUAL audio report by an apparent (self-proclaimed)
corporate insider/whistleblower who provides rare insight among
9/11 investigation. He claims to have found himself, pre-9/11,
in the midst of significant financial players allegedly involved
behind the scenes, and shares info that incriminates
some major corporations, and suggests who made/makes
the big bucks (see also Internet
addition to a huge group of 'ordinary' people investigating 9/11
on the Internet, a growing number of "well
known and respected senior members of the U.S. intelligence services,
military, and government have expressed significant criticism
of the 9/11 Commission Report."
Finally, someone has collected them all and created a site
that lists them and provides links to their comments. Well
worth a look, but caution is advised because it includes some
'ringers' in my opinion. The point is, government/corporate misdeed
is nothing new (what the heck was Vietnam?). In fact, it's an
ongoing thing as numerous historical events show, and I find it
hard to believe some of these 'whistleblower' types had no clue
about this government crime--especially the career types, who
play the system for their retirements. Always beware disinfo
let's look at one of the more surprising and obvious events, the
sudden collapse of WTC Bldg 7 in the late afternoon of 9/11/01.
There are two graphics below. The one first is a picture of #7
at 3 PM, showing a few small fires. Admittedly, the building was
hit on its south face by debris from the North Tower and sustained
some structural damage. Logically, however, this would have led
to a toppling over, not a symmetrical, straight-down, total disintegration.
are arguments about ongoing fires, but the truth is, in all of
history, raging fires have never caused steel-frame buildings
to collapse. There was nothing in WTC 7 that could burn hot enough
to do so anyway.
is the 3 PM picture. Below it is an animated GIF that shows the
sudden collapse a couple of hours later. What explains it, and
what does it look like to you?
on this section is currently stalled do to time constraint. Please
see Internet Resources for more
info. But for one of the best overall analyses I'm aware of, read
closely the excellent body of research by Australian musician
Gerard Holmgren. Especially
interesting and important is his contention that commercial planes
were not used to hit buildings.