Editorial
'Dailies'-18
General
Disclaimer
Any
health information provided herein is for educational purposes only.
IT
IS NOT INTENDED AS A SUBSTITUTE FOR
EVALUATION OR TREATMENT BY A HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL.
Thu,
6/22 - Sun, 7/2/06 Same old themes
Response:
The old hypnocrats just keep rolling along.
Articles in the local paper continue to reflect the effects of cultural
hypnosis on officials, industry-captain types, and the paper itself.
First,
as it has done numerous times in apparent health ignorance, the S&E
published a "cute" picture on 6/22 of very young kids ingesting
ice cream. This is the same paper that claims to be concerned about
kids' health, especially in re street drugs (whereas the primary motive
for concern seems actually to be city image in re its effect on growth
and profits).
Same day came an article proudly stating that the census says Fitchburg
is among the fastest-growing cities in the area. There is much drooling
among the commentators, who include the mayors and planning officials.
Comments to the effect that high prices toward Boston are driving buyers
into the waiting embrace of our area reflect a certain blindness about
what they're repeating here.
Mr Myopia, Leominster Planning Board Chairman John Souza, said Leominster
has a policy of working with developers and that the only negative impact
of growth would be increased traffic. Not only is that incorrect, but
it's propaganda implying that traffic is a minor concern--well, it is
to the growth mongers, who can't get enough. But not to any sane person,
to whom it's more than obvious that the growth-is-god philosophy did
to Boston what is driving the Conies this way.
Mayor Mazzarella's offering is that "growth is always good..."
How can you argue with such depth of clarity? Must be that tough '1
+ 1 =?' equation that's evading the pundits?
On another front, we see that Mayor Mazz is concerned about noise, namely
from loud car stereos. Motorcycles also get a passing mention. Several
years ago the Mayor and I had a talk about the loud bikes, which situation
he declared he was going to address. Guess what? And guess why. Why,
because a lot of cops and firemen own these obnoxious machines and they're
above the law--what cop is going to bust one of 'their own'? If any
of the chiefs have done anything, it's invisible.
But the loud stereos, why, that's where the crunch will come and where
the paper's emphasis is, because that's the 'low-life' sector of society--the
rude people, says the paper in an editorial on the weighty matter.
Speaking of inordinate attention to relatively insignificant matters,
the noise issue, of course, provides another platform for the tiring,
self-righteous stumping we get often enough from the paper, whose long
article on the subject devoted but one sentence to the bikes, which
are so much noisier than stereos. Go figure.
But too bad the Mayor and the paper's managerial staff don't get to
spend a day in that place they ignore in their official functions--Iraq,
where the noise is a bit greater. We see no significant offical or editorial
attention to conditions in the world beyond the local noses. Conditions
which arise from the same basic infuence that plays a major role in
local challenges. Locally, it's all about bringing in city revenue and
promoting shopping, the world be damned.
To continue the growth madness, S&E editor McMenemy held forth on
7/2 about revitalizing downtown Fitchburg. The sort of Stepfordian utopia
envisioned by Mr Upscale Retail himself includes Mom and Dad America
happily walking down Main Street holding hands wth their 1.2 kiddie
Coneheads-to-be and patronizing "restaurants, book stores, and
gift shops." Oh the GLORY of it!
But wait! To safeguard the consumer orgy, we're going to need many foot-patrol
gendarmes on the street; but above all, we must rid the area of "social
services," because (and get this) "soccer moms won't come
to downtown Fitchburg if the social service agencies remain." Have
you ever heard more self-righteous elitist palaver in your life? Essentially,
he's saying the goodie-shoe condoned-drug addicts don't want the sight
of society's stigmatized failures to disturb their composure and money-spending
potential. Nothing but superior, squeaky clean, McMenemy-approved folk
should be allowed and seen downtown.
Why do I feel like throwing up.
The paper is always very concerned and vocal about local "drugs
and crime." But here's the funny part. If a group or person were
acting locally like the usurped US government does in the world, a red-faced
Jeff McMenemy would be arguing for their arrest and execution (not necessarily
in that order :-) Yet, within this womb of megacriminal behavior, Jeff
indulges dreams of a perfect ("upscale") dropshop world.
Maintaining the whirlwind pace of idiohypocrisy is an article about
teen clothes, and concerns that young girls are looking too enticing
and "giving off the "wrong impression." Oh JEEZ! We're
on our way back to Puritania. Meanwhile, nothing is said about America's
built-in cultural psychopathology about sexuality and nudity, which
underlies the reason for concern in the first place and helps turn innocent
babies into maladapted psyches that might pose a threat.
Not to mention that "adults" (as if there is any such thing)
don't want kids to mature too fast--it threatens the adult realm of
superiority and control (what they know and can have but kids can't).
And maybe adults just hate to see kids realize the less than noble apsects
of "adult" society, of which they may be secretly ashamed.
But the great kicker here is the picture of two teenage girls with braces
and glasses!
You see, ignorance about health is politically correct--at least behaviorally
so; and back we go to the first item in this piece, namely the paper's
promotion of the consumption of sugary junk that leads to glasses and
crooked teeth, which are now part of the normal landscape for kids.
And that's fine as long as their unhealthy little bodies are decently
clad. Can there be worse nonsense and hypocrisy? YES!! And it comes
with a piece on 7/2 about a tour of medical-device plastics manufacturers.
The tour is organized by the North Central Mass Chamber's "massPLASTICS
Medical Device Connection." This is designed to promote local plastics
companies who make the devices and who want to capitalize on the market.
Once again, we come face to face with the reality of an economy dependent
upon people being sick. Of course! In other words, widepsread wellness
would put a serious crimp in the medical device industry, as it would
in the Pharma cabal, not to mention bankrupting hospitals. This is why
conventional medicine was desgined to perpetuate illness.
So, let's pray for a strong economy for the North Central Mass chamber
of medical commerce horrors.
Adding up the above, you might wonder just what part of the equation
'1 + 1 =?' these folks don't get.
Tue, 30 Jun '06
S&E editorial: Uniting to fight crime
Response:
Nice idea, wrong crime.
This piece praises a neighborhood walk that was organized in Fitchburg,
MA to send a message that the people have had it with the "drugs
and crime" that plague the town.
Based on the stony silence to many of my communications about this to
the paper, as well as local officials, my suspicion is that their main
concern is the city's image, so that more people will move there to inhabit
the 'upscale' condos and facilitate the upscale retail consumer orgy seen
as the great salvation of the community. Upscale me this, Batman. It's
all shortsighted, reactionary nonsense.
The
following is the text of an email I sent to town officials on 6/22/06
to suggest a different perspective on the threats we face:
Dear Folks,
The sincerity and good intention of the idea of the community "uniting
to fight crime" locally is obvious. Just as obvious--with a look
beyond the end of our nose--is that much greater crime, and exponentially
greater threat, is being committed under that nose, without so much
as a sneeze from, especially, local newsmedia and officials. To the
contrary, local newsmedia and officials dutifully cooperate.
I've written previously about the theft of wealth and loss of national
soul. Linked below are two related articles, recently brought to my
attention, about another major symptom of the elite manipulation of
society. The first is a scholarly work by skilled investigative
writer Amy Worthington that provides solid background for the second,
which is hard, alarming, current-news evidence of what's going on.
Much of our suggested misplaced priority SEEMS due to the fact that
no local newsperson or politician (or state official) is willing to investigate,
or think critically about, matters beyond their "local
nose" but of utmost concern and impact. Instead, they
SEEM to prefer the safety of the Status Quo, Convention, and the dictates
of 'authority,' thereby selling the public/their constituents, who are
generally also not lifting a finger to save their own ass, down the
river. Ironically, this behavior generally exacerbates the local challenges
officials keep proclaiming they want to improve.
The local fight against "drugs/crime" has become a grand hypocrisy.
No one, especially officials, will even consider, much less admit, that
the summary effects of common behaviors to which they approvingly cling
and even depend, easily have greater negative impact than those which
they decry--especially on the kids. Under the banner of superiority,
what's LEGAL (or not) takes precedence over what's JUST, WISE, or even
SANE in some cases.
Fitchburg Police Chief Cronin, at least, has asked the larger question,
with the implication of what is it about our society that produces so
much "crime." In contrast to this stands the newspaper, to
which the notion of societal culpability is apparently alien.
Concerning the greater crime, the main issue is that no matter what
our function locally, we're US citizens, with the inalienable Constitutional
duty to control our federal government--and we are DIRECTLY responsible
for everything it does, at home and abroad, including organized murder.
This is called 'accessory to' in legalese.
This letter concerns the egregious domestic crimes of the corporatist
(this means fascist) US government and the burgeoning police state. It's
now virtually cliché to call it Orwellian, but there is no better
word to describe it. Officials will tell you it's good for us. But it's
based on big lies and ruthless manipulation, such as WMD and 9/11.
The Sentinel & Enterprise, and local and state officials and politicians
can ignore these articles, or dismiss this issue as you seem wont to
do, as you already have just about every story and concern I've sent.
But it's unlikely the people will stir unless you become lead activists
and do something beyond supervising local budgets and the construction
of condos and shopping plazas.
As communities--will we just keep remodeling the basement while the
house burns down?
1) http://www.rense.com/general69/police.htm
"Senate
Minority leader Harry Reid (D-NV) calls this Congress the 'most corrupt'
in history.(1) U.S. Representative Ron Paul (R-TX) often uses the term
"police state" to describe our national state of affairs.
George Bush is making the most expansive claims to unbridled power since
America's War for Independence, according to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT).(2)
Former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who proved Bush/Cheney lied to
launch us into war with Iraq, says "fascist forces have seized
control of the levers of power."(3)
[[Joseph Wilson makes the common error of regarding this as something
new, as opposed to a new version or phase of the same old thing. - PT]]
2)
Whistle-Blower's
Evidence, Uncut
Former AT&T technician Mark Klein is the key witness in
the Electronic Frontier Foundation's class-action lawsuit against the
telecommunications company, which alleges that AT&T cooperated in
an illegal National Security Agency domestic surveillance program.
Best,
PeterT
---------------
NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency and Big Brother may read this email without warning, warrant,
or notice, and certainly without probable cause. They may do this without
any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse or protection
against such unconstitutional violation of your personal effects save
to call for the impeachment of the current 'president' and his entire
'Cabal-inet' and to move froward with the understanding that the War
on Terror is an elite protection racket designed to pave the way for
Orwell's nightmare.
Sun,
6 Jun '06 S&E editorial: Bush should fire Rumsfeld ... now
Response:
Proof of evolution?
As one who opposes just about every S&E editorial opinion, I must
give credit where due. This piece is a credit to the paper, especially
because it tacitly admits its error in supporting the Iraq 'war' (crime
against humanity, Nature and God).
I say "tacitly admits," because it says the paper supported
the war because it seemed like the right thing to do, based on Dubya's
contentions about WMD, and that Iraq posed a threat to the US. "He
was wrong," says the paper.
The latter statement is typical S&E rhetoric, because it implies
that Dubya was "wrong" about the WMD being there. NO: Dubya
was not wrong about WMD, he and his cronies lied impeachably. So, "We
were wrong," or "I was wrong" would be correct for the
paper, meaning it foolishly believed the lie, which itself was "wrong"
to do.
Nevertheless, this is a lot for the paper to admit and may be proof
that evolution is possible for the politically correct, conservative,
flag-waving guardian of the Status-Quo. So I give it credit, even though
the rest of the analysis is laced with misconception--such as, we did
a good thing by taking out Saddam. NO: we did a very bad thing by putting
him in there to do exactly what he did--mainly start the war with Iran.
But such ideas are probably beyond anything the paper could evolve to,
or if it could, express (even though it has been repeatedly informed
of such matters--by me, for one).
Also, the conclusion, that Bush should fire Rummy, because Bush "...made
the decision...based on faulty or trumped-up intelligence and then let
Rumsfeld botch the job..." is naive, and misses the point.
Naive, because these elite operatives are too experienced to "botch"
the job (and are probably not even making the big decisions), so that
there is some ulterior reason for the chaos (huge profit is one of the
basics). There's even evidence that 'we' are abetting the chaos (my
theory is that 'we' are inciting it).
It misses the point, because Bush should fire Rumsfeld, himself, and
the entire Satanic Cabal called his Cabinet.
Of course, even that won't cure the disease that is our usurped federal
government.
Sat,
3 Jun '06 S&E editorial: Businesses must lawfully employ
Response:
'Real' Americans lamenting about those nasty "illegals."
"We believe there's no proper rationalization for hiring undocumented
people," snorts the S&E. See, with the paper, it's always what
the law is, not what justice is. Like most people, the paper doesn't
realize that's why we have juries, to fly in the face of the law to
achieve justice when necessary.
The problem is not the hiring of "undocumented people" (gasp!)
but the policy of paying them less to gain a competitive edge--rather
than doing a better job, for example. But this is typically the American
way, is it not. Always the angle, always the slick deal. Our society
is made of angles and slck deals.
Wages ought to be controlled, within a reasonable range, for the same
work. In this way, not only would undocumented people not be getting
screwed, but competition between employing businesses would be on a
level field.
[Please
see 5 May '06 Letter-to-Editor submission.]
Thu, 1 Jun '06 S&E Editorial: Chuck E. Cheese's must reexamine
admission policy
Response:
Adolescent grammar appropriate for misconception.
A level 3 sex offender was caught in the kiddie pizza-chain restaurant,
sitting at a tabel while 40 kids celebrated birthdays.
Like street drugs, this is yet another not-to-miss platform for the
paper's favorite pastime: misinformed, self-righteous, politically correct
moralizing.
'Bad grammar,' because there should be no apostrophe (possessive case)
in "Cheese's." It's the way an adolescent would talk.
'Misinformed,' because the paper assumes the greatest threat to kids
in that place was the sex offender, whereas it truly was the highly
processed, chemicalized, life-negative, even carcinogenic, substances
passed off as food that are the establishment's wares.
"Parents take their kids to Chuck E. Cheese's [here we go again]
for fun or celebration. They don't go there to place children in peril."
Ah, but in ignorance they do just that. But this is typical American
dietary behavior, the answer to which is walk, run, ride, hop, skip,
and jump for disease research.
It wouldn't be so bad if kids were fed wholesome, live food most of
the time, but the daily lives of so many are filled with variations
on the Chuck E crap theme. No better example than the school lunch program.
The good adults/parents pass their nonfood-substance addictions on to
the kids as "fun and celebration."
'Self-righteous,' because of the hypocrisy of the paper's avowed concern
for the welfare of kids, characterized by its neglect of serious threats
in favor of 'politically correct,' emotionally charged ones that can
be played up as the sentiment fitting popular notions of what it means
to be 'so very concerned.'
And here's a goodie: "The company should not allow adults without
children entry..." This is nonsense on several levels, one of which
is, why couldn't a sex offender have a kid in tow? But what, really,
does anyone think the guy is going to do in a crowded public place?
Admittedly, he was taking pictures.
Finally, the fact that such people exist is testimony to a sexually
dysfunctional, massively hypocritical society that is failing to 'rehabilitate'
the symptoms of its own condition. But with the S&E, society itself
never has any component of responsibility, and is always the injured
party.
Tue,
30 Jun '06 S&E editorial: Uniting to fight crime
Response:
Nice idea, wrong crime.
This piece praises a neighborhood walk that was organized in Fitchburg,
MA to send a message that the people have had it with the "drugs
and crime" that plague the town.
Based on the stony silence to many of my communications about this to
the paper, as well as local officials, my suspicion is that their main
concern is the city's image, so that more people will move there to inhabit
the 'upscale' condos and facilitate the upscale retail consumer orgy seen
as the great salvation of the community. It's all very shortsighted, reactionary
nonsense.
The following is the text of an email I sent to Fitchburg officials (and
Leominster's--my town) to suggest a different perspective on where the
crime is:
Dear
Folks,
The sincerity and good intention of the idea of the community "uniting
to fight crime" locally is obvious. Just as obvious--with a look
beyond the end of our nose--is that much greater crime, and exponentially
greater threat, is being committed under that nose, without so much
as a sneeze from, especially, local newsmedia and officials. To the
contrary, local newsmedia and officials dutifully cooperate.
I've written previously about the theft of wealth and loss of national
soul. Linked below are two related articles, recently brought to my
attention, about another major symptom of the elite manipulation of
society. The first is a scholarly work by skilled investigative writer
Amy Worthington that provides solid background for the second, which
is hard, alarming, current-news evidence of what's going on.
Much of our suggested misplaced priority SEEMS due to the fact that
no local newsperson or politician (or state official) is willing to
investigate or think critically about matters beyond their "local
nose" but of utmost concern and impact. Instead, they SEEM to prefer
the safety of the Status Quo, Convention, and the dictates of 'authority,'
thereby selling the public/their constituents, who are generally also
not lifting a finger to save their own ass, down the river. Ironically,
this behavior generally exacerbates the local challenges officials keep
proclaiming they want to improve.
The local fight against "drugs/crime" has become a grand hypocrisy.
No one, especially officials, will even consider, much less admit, that
the summary effects of common behaviors to which they approvingly cling
and even depend, easily have greater negative impact than those which
they decry--especially on the kids. Under the banner of superiority,
what's LEGAL (or not) takes precedence over what's JUST, WISE, or even
SANE in some cases.
Fitchburg Police Chief Cronin, at least, has asked the larger question,
with the implication of what is it about our society that produces so
much "crime." In contrast to this stands the newspaper, to
which the notion of societal culpability is apparently alien.
Concerning the greater crime, the main issue is that no matter what
our function locally, we're US citizens, with the inalienable Constitutional
duty to control our federal government--and we are DIRECTLY responsible
for everything it does, at home and abroad, including organized murder.
This is called 'accessory to' in legalese.
This letter concerns the egregious domestic crimes of the corporatist
(this means fascist) US government and the burgeoning police state.
It's now virtually cliché to call it Orwellian, but there is
no better word to describe it. Officials will tell you it's good for
us. But it's based on big lies and ruthless manipulation, such as WMD
and 9/11.
The Sentinel & Enterprise, and local and state officials and politicians
can ignore these articles, or dismiss this issue as you seem wont to
do, as you already have just about every story and concern I've sent.
But it's unlikely the people will stir unless you become lead activists
and do something beyond supervising budgets, economic growth, and the
construction of condos and shopping plazas.
As communities--will we just keep remodeling the basement while the
house burns down?
1) "Senate Minority leader Harry Reid (D-NV) calls this Congress
the "most corrupt" in history.(1) U.S. Representative Ron
Paul (R-TX) often uses the term "police state" to describe
our national state of affairs. George Bush is making the most expansive
claims to unbridled power since America's War for Independence, according
to Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT).(2) Former U.S. Ambassador Joseph Wilson,
who proved Bush/Cheney lied to launch us into war with Iraq, says "fascist
forces have seized control of the levers of power."(3)
[[Joseph Wilson makes the common error of regarding this as something
new, as opposed to a new version or phase of the same old thing. - PT]]
http://www.rense.com/general69/police.htm
2)
Whistle-Blower's
Evidence, Uncut
Former AT&T technician Mark Klein is the key witness in the Electronic
Frontier Foundation's class-action lawsuit against the telecommunications
company, which alleges that AT&T cooperated in an illegal National
Security Agency domestic surveillance program.
Best,
PeterT
--------------------------------
NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security
Agency and Big Brother may read this email without warning, warrant,
or notice, and certainly without probable cause. They may do this without
any judicial or legislative oversight. You have no recourse or protection
against such unconstitutional violation of your personal effects save
to call for the impeachment of the current 'president' and his entire
'Cabal-inet' and to move froward with the understanding that the War
on Terror is an elite protection racket designed to pave the way for
Orwell's nightmare.
Sun,
6 Jun '06 S&E editorial: Bush should fire Rumsfeld ... now
Response:
Proof of evolution?
As one who opposes just about every S&E editorial opinion, I must
give credit where due. This piece is a credit to the paper, especially
because it tacitly admits its error in supporting the Iraq 'war' (crime
against humanity, Nature and God).
I say "tacitly admits," because it says the paper supported
the war because it seemed like the right thing to do, based on Dubya's
contentions about WMD, and that Iraq posed a threat to the US. "He
was wrong," says the paper.
The latter statement is typical S&E rhetoric, because it implies
that Dubya was "wrong" about the WMD being there. NO: Dubya
was not wrong about WMD, he and his cronies lied impeachably. So, "We
were wrong," or "I was wrong" would be correct for the
paper, meaning it foolishly believed the lie, which itself was "wrong"
to do.
Nevertheless, this is a lot for the paper to admit and may be proof
that evolution is possible for the politically correct, conservative,
flag-waving guardian of the Status-Quo. So I give it credit, even though
the rest of the analysis is laced with misconception--such as, we did
a good thing by taking out Saddam. NO: we did a very bad thing by putting
him in there to do exactly what he did--mainly start the war with Iran.
But such ideas are probably beyond anything the paper could evolve to,
or if it could, express (even though it has been repeatedly informed
of such matters--by me, for one).
Also, the conclusion, that Bush should fire Rummy, because Bush "...made
the decision...based on faulty or trumped-up intelligence and then let
Rumsfeld botch the job..." is naive, and misses the point.
Naive, because these elite operatives are too experienced to "botch"
the job (and are probably not even making the big decisions), so that
there is some ulterior reason for the chaos (huge profit is one of the
basics). There's even evidence that 'we' are abetting the chaos (my
theory is that 'we' are inciting it).
It
misses the point, because Bush should fire Rumsfeld, himself, and the
entire Satanic Cabal called his Cabinet.
Of course, even that won't cure the disease that is our usurped federal
government.
Sat,
3 Jun '06 Letter to Editor: Peter G Tocci [see editorial letters
archive, edletcomp3.html#memday]
Sat,
3 Jun '06 S&E editorial: Businesses must lawfully employ
Response:
'Real' Americans lamenting about those nasty "illegals."
"We believe there's no proper rationalization for hiring undocumented
people," snorts the S&E. See, with the paper, it's always what
the law is, not what justice is. The paper should consider that one
reason for juries is to 'fly in the face' of the law to achieve justice
when necessary (few people realize this, but think judges are God).
The problem is not the hiring of "undocumented people" (gasp!)
but the policy of paying them less to gain a competitive edge--rather
than doing a better job, for example. But this is typically the American
way, is it not. Always the angle, always the slick deal. Our society
is made of the stuff.
Wages ought to be controlled, within a reasonable range, for the same
work. In this way, not only would undocumented people not be getting
screwed, but competition between employing businesses would be on a
level field.
Thu,
1 Jun '06 S&E Editorial: Chuck E. Cheese's must reexamine admission
policy
Response:
Jeeses, its cheese's: Bad grammar applied to misconception.
A level 3 sex offender was caught in the kiddie pizza-chain restaurant,
sitting at a tabel while 40 kids celebrated birthdays.
Like street drugs, this is yet another not-to-miss platform for the
paper's favorite pastime: misinformed, self-righteous, politically correct
moralizing.
'Bad grammar,' because there should be no apostrophe (possessive case)
in "Cheese's." It's the way an adolescent would talk.
'Misinformed,' because the paper assumes the greatest threat to kids
in that place was the sex offender, whereas it truly was the highly
processed, chemicalized, life-negative, even carcinogenic, substances
passed off as food that are the establishment's wares.
"Parents take their kids to Chuck E. Cheese's [here we go again]
for fun or celebration. They don't go there to place children in peril."
Ah, but in ignorance they do just that. But this is typical American
dietary behavior, the answer to which is walk, run, ride, hop, skip,
and jump for disease research.
It wouldn't be so bad if kids were fed wholesome, live food most of
the time, but the daily lives of so many are filled with variations
on the Chuck E crap theme. No better example than the school lunch program.
The good adults/parents pass their nonfood-substance addictions on to
the kids as "fun and celebration."
'Self-righteous,' because of the hypocrisy of the paper's avowed concern
for the welfare of kids, characterized by its neglect of serious threats
in favor of 'politically correct,' emotionally charged ones that can
be played up as the sentiment fitting popular notions of what it means
to be 'so very concerned.'
And here's a goodie: "The company should not allow adults without
children entry..." This is nonsense on several levels, one of which
is, why couldn't a sex offender have a kid in tow? But what, really,
does anyone think the guy is going to do in a crowded public place?
Admittedly, he was taking pictures.
Finally, the fact that such people exist is testimony to a sexually
dysfunctional, massively hypocritical society that is failing to 'rehabilitate'
the symptoms of its own condition. But with the S&E, society itself
never has any component of responsibility, and is always the injured
party.
Archive
of Editorial Letters
Peter
G. Tocci is a Holistic wellness consultant and health writer dba Associated
Health Services in Leominster, Massachusetts.
Check
out Holistic Health Information
Associated
Health Services
978.537.6991
Gemini
Press
978.537.2553
E-mail
for both:
peter<at>geminipress<dot>com
Or
Send S-mail:
Peter G. Tocci
22 Walker St. #2
Leominster, Mass. USA 01453
Home
Page
Top |