Gemini Press 4

Information and Links about Society's Symptoms of
the power Elite's
deep manipulation and control.


Editorial Archive TOC
  Editorial 'Dailies' TOC

Holistic Health
  Information and Literature
  Health Care Reform

Politics and Business
  Elite Agenda and M-O
  Elite Symptoms TOC
  Symptoms 4

Radical Communion

Internet Resources

Recommended Reading

Graphic/Page Design
  Samples Only

Symptoms of the Elite Agenda
Vaccine NONsense

General Disclaimer

Any health information provided here is for educational purposes only.

This page describes a major symptom of Elite influence and control. The operations (conspiracies) intended to advance the Elite Agenda of fascist, global dominion (supranational world government using business-dominated entities) comprise most of the world's major geopolitical, social, and financial chaos.

If you are new to the idea of the 'Power Elite' (aka 'Ruling Class,' 'Elite,' 'Illuminati,' 'Corporatocracy,' and so on), please see the introductory summary/description
Elite Agenda and M-O.

Here is a more extensive analysis [off-site link, new window/tab], though not quite as involved as it gets. Be aware that there are varying views on the nature and scope of the Elite. For example, the preceding link says they've been active for about a hundred years, whereas others say centuries, even thousands of years. I lean toward the latter view.

It can be difficult to believe the medical industry would knowingly harm infants with vaccines. Certainly, most rank and file doctors would not. But a look at the sordid history of industrial medicine and the ruthless Elite manipulation and control of human societies in areas other than medicine usually eases this challenging shift in perspective. There are few, if any, aspects of our lives they don't heavily influence, and even control. The more you learn about them, the easier it is to see that this is so, and to see through many lapdog politicians and 'the news.'

Vaccine Rationale... Is It Rational?

The purported rationale for vaccination, which is virtually forced routinely on children, is to prevent infectious "diseases." However, if we delve into history, concepts, definitions, and alternatives, this rationale becomes highly questionable at best. A major question is the definition of "a disease.""

In the mid-19th century, tiny life forms we call bacteria and fungi (yeast) were being discovered. Wine had been made for millennia, but what was doing it was not understood. Similarly, it was found that bacteria were associated with disease. Louis Pasteur is credited with this discovery, and, with the help of the French Academy of Science and some friends in high places, he gospelized and institutionalized the notion that specific bacteria cause specific diseases. It became known as the germ theory of disease.

Pasteur's contemporary Antoine Béchamp had a different slant. A brilliant scientist the likes of Galileo, Béchamp also conflicted with vested interest, earning him historical obscurity. Holding three degrees, three professorships, and earning several honors and awards, Béchamp was one of the great scientists in history—of the caliber of a Lavoisier. It was he who first demonstrated "the germs of the air," not Louis Pasteur (he was also first to identify blood as a tissue, not a liquid).

Béchamp said that it does appear as though bacteria cause disease, as Pasteur, who plagiarized his work, insisted. But the whole truth, Béchamp said, is that the bacteria are opportunists, not the prime movers. In other words, disease 'causes' bacteria, or more precisely, for germs to take hold, the body's "terrain" (inner environment) must be unbalanced. The mere presence of the germ is not enough. Pasteur admitted this on his deathbed, but it was too late—for science and the sickened world that would result.

Béchamp also said that it isn't the primary purpose of these organisms to produce diseases, but to recycle the body upon death and return it to the earth.This was a profound insight.

The 'condition' of which Béchamp spoke is the crux of the whole matter. He referred to the inner body as a "terrain." He was speaking about health in terms of ecology—as in an environment (knowlege of immune function had not yet developed). Common, specific terrain imbalances, such as toxicity, eventually appear as diseases.

Béchamp saw bacterial proliferation as a symptom, not the cause, of disease. This makes all the difference, because the approach based upon the germ-theory half-truth targets symptoms, neglecting underlying conditions. This crucial subtlety also underlies the concept of what 'a disease' is, and thus conventional medicine's approach and methods. For more on this, click here.

The Big Lie
Béchamp's work led him to conclude that the doctrine of specific diseases was flawed. Briefly, there is no such thing as a specific disease—this is a conventional construct designed to maximize profit in the system, not wellness. There are specific disease conditions, or imbalances that lead to what are called diseases. Diseases are more accurately called symptom pictures, or symptomologies.

By mis-defining "disease," the profit-motivated system can make it look like its methods are effective, or there's a so-called cure, and at the same time perpetuate illness for future profit by ignoring inner ecology, or terrain imbalance (and often worsening it). Quite the setup.

This impacts vaccination in the following way: what they're vaccinating you against is a symptomology, not the cause of what's called the disease. Even if the vaccine works to prevent the appearance of the targeted symptoms (and they sometimes do), it is most likely to seriously weaken the body against other acute and chronic symptomologies. This puts the lie to the statement that the benefits outweigh the risk.

Research in this area—that is, the connection of vaccination to non-targeted symptoms—has been stymied by money/power control. This is especially so with regard to long-term and chronic effects, as opposed to immediate reactions/damage. The latter is what's implied in "the benefits outweigh the risk." In other words, the biggest part of that story has been omitted.

However, a lot of evidence exists in the medical literature, and the research venue is opening up. Much of that evidence, however, is simply being ignored. And people's lives are being devastated by a Frankensteinian assault on wellness backed up by oppressive, anti-American rules and laws that make vaccination routine, indiscriminate, and virtually mandatory. There is no bigger insult to freedom, and not many greater threats to health.

The Other Big Lie
We are told that the "immune system" is the "first line of defense" in the body. Again, this is clever language. First of all, there's no such thing anatomically as an immune system. There is immune function in a number of body systems. One of these is the lymphatic system, which produces specific immunity.

Specific immunity means that resistance is directed toward a specific germ (or toxin), and that the molecule or cell that is designed for the purpose has no other application. Specific immunity has two divisions called cell-mediated immunity; and humoral, or antibody-mediated immunity (the most 'famous' one, which vaccines target).

We are told that specific function is the 'first line of defense.' However, this is not logical, because the specific division has to 'learn' a germ first to be optimally effective. It is, in fact, a backup system, so that by the time it has to kick in, the horse is out of the barn and we get sick anyway.

A first-time encounter with a germ elicits a moderate response which then 'records' that germ in the cells in case it shows up again. The second response, known as 'anamnestic,' is much more vigorous, and will nip it in the bud—which is why if you've had measles, you don't get it again. Does it make sense that our first line of defense would leave us life-threateningly susceptible?

The first line of defense in immunity is non-specific, because it responds to everything and is our elegant janitorial service (and recycling department) that keeps the house clean. With regard to germs, however, the first line of defense, as noted above, is the more general condition of the body's inner ecology, or terrain. The vaccine pretends to mimick a natural infection that has been met with specific response.

Because critical misconceptions that underlie conventional medicine are not mere mistakes, but are contrivances, I 'affectionately' call it 'conmedicine' for short. Under the Elite umbrella, however, many industries conspire to compromise health. If you think there's no malfeasance here, check out this story about carcinogens in baby products.

The assault on babies is further documented in Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills by Russel Blaylock, MD. He tells how Gerber was at one time putting MSG in 'Gerber Graduates' baby food under guise of "hydrolized protein." Remember when MSG was banned? Too bad we can't send ol' Jim Traficant over there to give a few folks some kicked nuts. We could call that Pulverized Scrotein, and use it as a dairy substitute in the boardroom coffee.

Vaccine Safety?
When I say, "No vaccine has ever been proven safe and effective," sometimes the response is that I'm mistaken, because safety studies have been done. Then the medical literature is quoted. While it is true that studies have been done, the quality of those studies is in serious question.

One tactic used in "science" is to publish an article with a desired conclusion, and then refer to it endlessly in the literature. By the time further analysis shows it to be junk, it makes no practical difference, because the article and its references have become entrenched as "what is known." Here is an example of what constitutes "vaccine research" (lies in bold).

In December 2002, the FDA approved GlaxoSmithKline's Pediarix® for diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, hepatitis B, and polio...claiming "there were no vaccine-related serious adverse events...after any vaccine dose." But upon reading the study we learn: "Two subjects withdrew from the study because of serious adverse events that were determined by the safety monitor to be unrelated to vaccination. One subject...was diagnosed with a seizure disorder 14 days after the first immunization. Another subject...neuroblastoma detected 6 weeks after the first immunization. Six others [were]...hospitalized for brochiolitis/pneumonia (4), meningitis (1) and apnea (1) but this was also determined to be unrelated to vaccination." Pediarix® contains formaldehyde, glutaraldehyde, 2-Phenoxyethanol (antifreeze), Thimerosal (mercury), monkey cells, neomycin, polymyxin B, polysorbate 80, and yeast protein.
Sylvia H. Yeh, MD. et al. Safety and immunogenicity of a pentavalent diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B and polio combination vaccine in infants. Ped Inf. Dis. J. 2001;20:973-980.

Based on this "research" the FDA deems Pediarix safe. What do you think?

The truth is, with enough money, you can buy any set of conclusions you want. Who has the most money for this? This fact has come much more to light due to the abuses of science by the W. Bush administration.

Statistical Gymnastics—Gold Medal for Conmedicine
What is not told is that infectious epidemics run a natural course. They arrive, peak, and burn out—all by themselves, with no help from Dr. Frankenstein. Vaccines are generally introduced shortly after the peak in statistics, which makes it look like the vaccine is working. In her milestone book, Immunization: The Reality Behind the Myth, Walene James tells the story of polio. I love this one.

During the rise of the big polio epidemic in the U.S., doctors were being payed ($25) for every polio diagnosis they reported. It was known, however that polio would resolve itself in 30 days in 50% of cases. So, while the "disease" was on the rise, the rule was the person had to have the symptoms for a week. Once it peaked, however, and the vax was introduced, the period of presentation was increased to more than 30 days. So if you had it and it went away, you never had it.

Another trick used in the polio scam was to include a "cousin" disease in the diagnosis, called aseptic meningitis. Calling this polio naturally boosted incidence. After vax intro, aseptic meningitis was removed, causing a decline in incidence. You have to hand it to them.

In the book is also the story of a doctor who told the people of his town that if they wanted to avoid polio in the coming summer to keep sugar away from the kids. Incidence dropped dramatically in that area.

Best way to get rid of a disease - stop reporting it.

Chickenpox Party: Developing Natural Varicella Immunity

By Brian Wimer, Jacquelyn L. Emm and Deren Bader. Mothering magazine, Issue 112, Jan/Feb 2004.

From 1987 to 1997, the reported national incidence of chickenpox decreased 58%. (2) In fact, doctors are no longer required to report chickenpox cases to local and state health departments—which just might have some influence on optimistically low chickenpox statistics. 'The decrease from 1987 to 1997 corresponded with decreases in the number of states reporting to NNDSS and the completeness of reporting,' admits the CDC. Areas reporting dropped from 46 states and DC in 1972 to 20 states in 1997. What declined was the reporting, not the incidence of chickenpox. Today, the CDC actively watches only three US sites for varicella: West Philadelphia , PA; Travis County, TX; and Antelope Valley , LA, CA (3) Two years after vaccine licensure, in the 14 states that maintained continuous reporting of varicella, the incidence remained completely unchanged, at 107.0 cases per 100,000 population. (4)
See the rest (including the references) here.

Dangers of Vaccines
With the enactment of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, the US government (and medicine), acknowledged (only a century late) that, at least, immediate reaction/damage does occur. VAERS, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, was established in 1991 and was designed to compensate families of damaged kids. There are at least two big problems with this setup.
1) The money for it comes, not from drug companies, but from the people's pockets, and the drug companies are off the liability hook (even when they cook up especially nasty batches called "Hot Lots."

Many adverse events go unreported because they're unrecognized, and all long-term effects never even enter the picture.

The long-term effects of vaccines are chronic disturbance of immune function, the nervous system, and organs. Here is a short list of symptomologies: allergies, asthma, developmental disorders, ADD/ADHD, cancer, MS, cerebral palsy, diabetes, epilepsy/seizures, stuttering, and eating disorders. One of the worst ballooning epidemics is autism. Although autism and other maladies may have various causes, the common denominator is toxicity.

The major factor underlying the adverse effects of vaccines is toxic brain encephalitis, or brain inflammation, which can lead to many symptoms. Another important factor is that a vaccine can push a baby with a marginal supply of vitamin C into a condition called subclinical scurvy. This also leads to many metabolic disturbances, mostly associated with short-term reactions, including death.

Most toxicity study is bogus, because virtually NEVER is the potential synergy of the numerous poisons simultaneously passing into, through, and lodging in, biosystems taken into account. The allowed amount of 'this poison' is safe. This amount of 'that poison' is safe, and so on disintegratedly, ad infinitum, or a bit more accurately, ad the 80,000 or so virtually unregulated chemicals now infused into our inner and outer environments. Not to mention the ever growing background of radioactive environmental poisoning bestowed upon us by the insane people promoting the nuclear power and weapons industry. Nor, apparently, is the completely unpredictable and greatly varying ability of human babies to eliminate toxins taken into account.

So if you begin to understand the Elite and the malfeasance of the Elite-driven medical system, you can understand the push for vaccination with this potentiation of profitable research and treatment: The CDC recommends that "healthy" children get injected with at least 45 vaccines by the age of six months. And by the time of entering school at 4-6 years of age, at least 74 vaccines! The irony is that whether the child is healthy or not, he has no need for vaccine.

To this enormous biological insult, is frequently added the sickening encore of flu vaccine.

Unjustified fear of childhood 'diseases' is used as a tactic to force compliance. And of course, people aren't being told there's a much better way to ward off, or minimize the effects of, childhood disease. First, it is highly unlikely that one of these infectious symptomologies, such as diphtheria or pertussis will take hold in a truly healthy child. Secondly, if it does, it will not be damaging or life-threatening, and will even strengthen the child, as challenges tend to do.

If the child is unhealthy, vaccines will not help anyway (keep in mind what was said about merely preventing the appearance of targeted symptoms, while increasing susceptibility to others).

Let's look briefly at how to address childhood disease, or any disease, rationally and effectively. As noted above, it's mainly a question of inner ecology, or terrain balance. Think of seeds being unable to germinate on asphalt, or trying to grow palm trees in Alaska (although this may become less far fetched if humanity continues on its headlong destruction of planetary ecology with global warming).

The best way to prevent childhood disease is for healthy mothers to breastfeed their infants (of course, our toxic way of life has thrown a  monkey wrench into this holy act, because toxified milk is downloaded to the infant. Unfortunately, there's more knowledge required to get a driver's license than to have a baby. Anyone can do it, no matter how ill-informed about health. And even very unhealthy women can conceive. It's the lack of knowledge about health, instilled in large part by the influence of flawed medical philosophy on our culture, that results in the threat to newborns of unhealthy mothers.

This article is not intended to teach health, but one of the most important factors is a full complement of pro-life bacteria (probiotics) in the intestinal tract and throughout the body, which mother passes to  baby. These bacteria underlie a robust digestive system, which, together with a strong immune-globulin presence in mucosal tissue (linings of lungs and GI tract) make up the 'first line of defense;' and all this supports our inner, non-specific balancing processes.

Vaccination is NONSENSE. - End

See Recommended Reading for vaccine books

Offsite Vaccine Links
Vaccine Risk Awareness Network

Vaccine Ingredients PDF (right-click or Option-click (Mac) to download
Vaccine Package Inserts
Vaccines and Immune Suppression (technical)
State Exemptions Help
See my post on autism/mercury/vax on Huffington Post (scroll down--it begins with: "Please, let this debate not begin and end with mercury/autism...").

Archive of Editorial Letters

Page Top

Just Say NO to the Flu Vaccine

During October and November, numerous reports usually say we're about to have a nasty flu epidemic. There will be reports of possible school closings, restricted air travel, and many. All of these messages are fed to the mass media to scare you into believing you need to get a flu shot.

Every year, flu vaccine manufacturers earn a hefty profit on the some 80-100 million vaccines they manufacture. The entire industry has become a cash cow for vaccine manufacturers such as Chiron. The average cost per dose is $10ó$15. This means Chiron could stand to add 1.5 billion dollars to their bottom line every year by scaring the public into mass inoculations.

Moreover, the CDC and various government health facilities help to perpetuate the farce on the American public, mainly because they are populated with people in the pharmas' pockets.

This year, Chiron already reported in a CNN story on September 29, 2004 that they have concerns about the safety of their vaccine because some batches were contaminated. This could be good or bad news depending on one's perspective. Since pharmas police themselves, I worry about contamination not caught--not that an "uncontaminated" vaccine isn't still poisonous enough.

The good news is, Chiron lost up to 4 million doses for the 2004 season, meaning that many escaped the toxic blast. The irony was, they said they'd give what's left to those most at risk, such as infants and the elderly—who also happen to be the most susceptible to the harmful effects of vaccines.

There are many reasons to not get a flu shot. For one, let's check out the ingredients, taken from the inserts that come with the vaccines. Among others, they contain two extremely dangerous chemicals: formaldehyde and mercury. Formaldehyde (embalming fluid) is a known carcinogen, and mercury is a known brain and neurological poison. Mercury has been, or is being, removed from most vaccines, but not the pediatric flu vaccine, of all things.

These chemicals can cause a strong damaging reaction and may lead to the development of autoimmune disorders such as Guillain-Barre syndrome, a disease that resembles Multiple Sclerosis.

The second reason to avoid flu vaccine is because it will not necessarily protect you from the flu (even if it did, the health price is too high). Every year the CDC recommends flu vaccine manufacturers put in 3 viral strains they guess might be the most common infections for the flu season. However, there are thousands of flu virus possibilities every winter. Taking a flu vaccine is basically a crap shoot. Also, officials frighten people with flu-death statistics, but never tell you how many of those got the vaccine.

Health officials at the CDC stated they had made a mistake in determining the viral ingredients for the 2003-2004 vaccine, and it would offer no protection for the flu virus that most people were contracting. However, they still pushed people to get a flu shot. This made no sense (except financially)!

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says babies under 2 who get the flu are more likely to be hospitalized for flu complications than older children. Last year's flu season hit children hard; 152 died, most of them under 5 years old. How many dead got the vaccine? They never say.

And the final reason you donít want a flu shot is probably the most important reason. If people pay attention to simple health principles, such as internal cleansing and good nutirtion, they won't be susceptible to flu or be levelled by it if they get it. Not only that, but the flu symptoms themselves are the body's way of cleaning itself out. All that guck coming out is good to get rid of, and most susceptibility is due to being clogged up.

We have a dynamic immune function with white blood cells that can attack and fight off the flu virus, so either you donít get the flu or you fight it off. If you do get the flu, immune function becomes stronger and you are the benefactor. Various studies have shown that when we fight off infections using our natural immunity, we are better protected from other life-threatening scenarios such as cancer.

In order to keep immunity strong, we need the friendly/symbiotic bacteria in our digestive tract and mucous membranes. This crucial  internal population is assaulted constantly in our society—for example, by chlorinated municipal water supplies, medications, and emotional stress. Thus, much better than vaccines is a probiotic regimen and high-quality diet, periodic internal cleansing, proper sleep, and good exercise, along with lots of pure water—up to a gallon a day.

There is still another side to this story. Spin. Most of the people who are said to have died from the flu actually contracted the flu secondarily to another symptomology they were battling. The flu was acting in an opportunistic way, and was not the sole reason for their death. Statistics can be misleading!

NEW (11/20/06) Dr. Sherri Tenpenny's article "Another Flu Vaccine Push Coming Soon"

If you would like further information on vaccines in general, the flu vaccine, and why you might want to SAY NO! you can visit the following links:

Offsite Vaccine Links
Vaccine/Flu Information
More on FluMist
United Press International investigation

Archive of Editorial Letters

Peter G. Tocci is a Holistic wellness consultant and health writer dba Associated Health Services in Leominster, Massachusetts.

Check out Holistic Health Information

Or Send S-mail:
Peter G. Tocci
22 Walker St. #2
Leominster, MA USA 01453


Page Top